Amazon Prime You Dont Know Jack
Reviews
-
Jan 24, 2022
Fascinating, informative, and well produced. My abode state so information technology was a lot more than familiar to me in many regards... Fieger commercials all the same air to this day.
Fascinating, informative, and well produced. My home land so it was a lot more familiar to me in many regards... Fieger commercials still air to this day.
-
May 29, 2021
Al Pacino stars equally Dr Jack Kevorkian the controversial doctor who opposed the courts to change the laws surrounding medico assisted suicide. Fascinating story that depicts the human story of his crusade. Pacino delivers an excellent subdued performance and is surrounded past a great supporting cast including John Goodman, Brenda Vaccaro and Susan Sarandon. Very good film.
Al Pacino stars as Dr Jack Kevorkian the controversial doctor who opposed the courts to change the laws surrounding doctor assisted suicide. Fascinating story that depicts the human story of his crusade. Pacino delivers an excellent subdued performance and is surrounded by a bully supporting bandage including John Goodman, Brenda Vaccaro and Susan Sarandon. Very good film.
-
Apr 12, 2021
Pacino's mesmerizing functioning depicts a truthful revolutionary and humanitarian in gripping way. Jack Kevorkian's story is ane that demanded to exist told. Excellent movie.
Pacino's mesmerizing performance depicts a truthful revolutionary and humanitarian in gripping mode. Jack Kevorkian's story is one that demanded to be told. Excellent movie.
-
Dec 17, 2020
Information technology'due south an interesting commentary on just one more than instance in which religion stands in the way of progress and comfort for humanity. It drags in some places simply information technology'due south an interesting story. The second half is better than the starting time.
Information technology's an interesting commentary on simply one more instance in which organized religion stands in the fashion of progress and condolement for humanity. It drags in some places but information technology's an interesting story. The second half is better than the first.
-
Jul 22, 2020
I've heard some call y'all Dr. Frankenstein... "I take that asa compliment. Anyone who's read the book knows he was a benevolent doc. It was lodge that made the monster."
I've heard some phone call you Dr. Frankenstein... "I take that asa compliment. Anyone who's read the book knows he was a benevolent doctor. It was social club that made the monster."
-
Jul 21, 2019
Then, assisted suicide, we are gonna need to talk virtually you lot today. This is a very touchy subject, peculiarly in a state that'due south and then much controlled by the religious right as the The states is. Now, of course, this film looks at events, now, over 20 years ago and I haven't kept upward with the laws and I do not know how many states accept passed laws in favor of doc assisted suicide in cases where at that place's no other course of action to exist taken to help the person improve, if non their chances of survival, if it's a terminal disease, and so their quality of life. I've always been of the opinion that, in cases such as where there's a terminal illness where the person is in constant pain and slowly, over a flow of time, withers away while their family unit suffers, and the person in question is rational, competent and of sound mind, then how can ANYONE oppose that person's determination to end their life with a little bit of dignity where they, essentially, simply go into a deep sleep that they never wake upward from. How is that amend than the culling of a person, on life support, having the plug pulled on them by their family and them, basically, starving to death. Which of these sounds like the more than humane solution??? Did you know that Patricia Clarkson, from Everybody Loves Raymond, is against assisted suicide. For religious reasons, considering of course she is. I think some advocacy groups engage in willful misinformation and they claim that, wrongfully I might add, that this means that disabled people should be eliminated. And nobody has e'er actually said that, because information technology would be against the person's volition. The arguments are that the person who is suffering should make the decision as to whether or not end their life and I'grand all for it. People can't alive their ain lives and now they're trying to live everyone else's. Of form, I'one thousand also for setting upwards a circuitous serial of hoops and so not only anybody can apply for this. We're gonna need every bit many opinions as nosotros can get, medical records, all-encompassing medical examinations, psychiatric evaluations to decide whether the person is actually suffering and in legitimate pain that they cannot recover from or if they're only lone, depressed and/or isolated. If they're in the latter group, assistance prepare them upwards with groups that can help with what afflicts them. Now that my spiel is out of the way, in terms of this movie, I'll exist honest, of course I knew of Dr. Jack Kevorkian. Who, effectually my age, doesn't know about this guy? I knew virtually him back before I was an developed and, back then, the perception I had of this guy was what I saw on TV, which was that he was a serial killer. I didn't have an opinion of him in the slightest, simply that was just the way the media sensationalized the case. It was a little flake subsequently in life that I did some inquiry on Mr. Kevorkian and came to the realization of what it is that he was doing and his reasoning for it. This picture show tells that story as Dr. Kevorkian goes effectually his business of, um, well assisting in his patients' deaths while also trying to circumvent the law and the super religious DA that attempts to cease him every chance he gets. In a lot of ways, this is kind of a heartbreaking motion-picture show to scout at times, because you practise get to come across some footage of the real interviews that Kevorkian filmed (most shot past his sister) with Al Pacino inserted through CG. Information technology's actually tragic to hear these stories of people who are in immense pain and the fact that they feel like the only way they can achieve the peace they've been looking for is past dying. What I recall the movie does well, outside of Al Pacino'due south FANTASTIC performance, is the fact that Dr. Kevorkian'due south message may have been the right one, it'south just that he may non take been the right messenger for. He engages in a lot of grandstanding with regime and that might give the impression that he is longing for the attending instead of trying to commencement a real national debate about a touchy discipline. But I exercise remember they balance that with the fact that, as nutty as Jack may be at times, he is also an incredibly intelligent and rational homo. It's just that his honesty and no-filter approach on things might take turned more people against him than he would have wanted. The fact is that Dr. Kevorkian'south methods weren't perfect and that's been reported on many times later his release and decease in 2011. He never actually met his kickoff patient, he just talked with her married man while the picture presents it as they had an extensive interview on photographic camera where Janet, the woman in question, tells her about the suffering she is in. At that place's people that might have been depressed and assisted suicide might non have been the best course of action. There's another woman that was misdiagnosed with MS. Things like that are things that the moving picture conveniently ignores. But, the affair is, I experience like the truth might have helped push more the theme of the fact that the message is the correct one, it'southward but that Jack, despite his honest intentions, only wasn't the right messenger. The film is really compelling to watch and, despite its length, information technology never once dragged. I hateful it's a movie that I wish I could go into more detail nearly, merely if I did, I would be here forever. I just call up that this is one of those films, and topics, that volition inspire spirited debate and I don't wanna keep going. As far as a motion picture is concerned, this is a really damn proficient movie and Al Pacino gives, in my opinion, ane of his best latter-day performances. For that alone, I can recommend it, even if you lot're wholeheartedly against the concept of assisted suicide but can nonetheless capeesh a quality film.
And so, assisted suicide, we are gonna need to talk virtually you today. This is a very touchy subject field, particularly in a state that's so much controlled by the religious right as the Usa is. Now, of form, this film looks at events, at present, over 20 years ago and I oasis't kept up with the laws and I practise not know how many states accept passed laws in favor of physician assisted suicide in cases where there'due south no other form of action to be taken to help the person ameliorate, if not their chances of survival, if it's a concluding illness, and then their quality of life. I've always been of the opinion that, in cases such as where there's a terminal illness where the person is in constant pain and slowly, over a menses of time, withers abroad while their family suffers, and the person in question is rational, competent and of sound heed, then how tin can ANYONE oppose that person's decision to end their life with a little bit of dignity where they, essentially, just get into a deep sleep that they never wake up from. How is that better than the alternative of a person, on life support, having the plug pulled on them past their family and them, basically, starving to death. Which of these sounds like the more humane solution??? Did you lot know that Patricia Clarkson, from Everybody Loves Raymond, is against assisted suicide. For religious reasons, because of course she is. I call up some advocacy groups engage in willful misinformation and they claim that, wrongfully I might add, that this means that disabled people should exist eliminated. And nobody has ever really said that, because it would be confronting the person'south volition. The arguments are that the person who is suffering should make the decision as to whether or not end their life and I'one thousand all for it. People tin't alive their own lives and at present they're trying to alive everyone else'southward. Of course, I'm also for setting up a complex series of hoops and so non only anybody can apply for this. We're gonna need as many opinions as we tin go, medical records, all-encompassing medical examinations, psychiatric evaluations to determine whether the person is actually suffering and in legitimate hurting that they cannot recover from or if they're just lone, depressed and/or isolated. If they're in the latter group, help set them up with groups that can assistance with what afflicts them. At present that my spiel is out of the mode, in terms of this picture, I'll be honest, of grade I knew of Dr. Jack Kevorkian. Who, around my historic period, doesn't know well-nigh this guy? I knew about him back earlier I was an adult and, back then, the perception I had of this guy was what I saw on TV, which was that he was a series killer. I didn't accept an opinion of him in the slightest, but that was only the way the media sensationalized the case. It was a petty bit later in life that I did some inquiry on Mr. Kevorkian and came to the realization of what it is that he was doing and his reasoning for it. This movie tells that story equally Dr. Kevorkian goes around his concern of, um, well profitable in his patients' deaths while as well trying to circumvent the law and the super religious DA that attempts to stop him every chance he gets. In a lot of ways, this is kind of a heartbreaking movie to sentinel at times, considering you do go to see some footage of the real interviews that Kevorkian filmed (well-nigh shot by his sister) with Al Pacino inserted through CG. It's really tragic to hear these stories of people who are in immense pain and the fact that they feel like the but style they tin attain the peace they've been looking for is past dying. What I retrieve the film does well, outside of Al Pacino'southward FANTASTIC performance, is the fact that Dr. Kevorkian'southward message may take been the right one, information technology's merely that he may not have been the right messenger for. He engages in a lot of grandstanding with government and that might requite the impression that he is longing for the attention instead of trying to start a real national debate about a touchy subject. But I do think they residual that with the fact that, as nutty as Jack may be at times, he is also an incredibly intelligent and rational homo. Information technology'due south but that his honesty and no-filter approach on things might have turned more than people confronting him than he would have wanted. The fact is that Dr. Kevorkian'southward methods weren't perfect and that'due south been reported on many times after his release and death in 2011. He never really met his starting time patient, he just talked with her husband while the movie presents it as they had an all-encompassing interview on camera where Janet, the woman in question, tells her about the suffering she is in. There's people that might take been depressed and assisted suicide might not take been the best course of activeness. There'due south another woman that was misdiagnosed with MS. Things like that are things that the movie conveniently ignores. But, the thing is, I experience like the truth might have helped push more the theme of the fact that the bulletin is the right one, it's just that Jack, despite his honest intentions, just wasn't the right messenger. The film is actually compelling to sentry and, despite its length, it never once dragged. I mean it'due south a movie that I wish I could go into more than detail about, but if I did, I would be hither forever. I just think that this is i of those films, and topics, that volition inspire spirited debate and I don't wanna keep going. As far equally a film is concerned, this is a really damn skillful pic and Al Pacino gives, in my stance, one of his best latter-twenty-four hour period performances. For that lone, I can recommend it, even if you're wholeheartedly against the concept of assisted suicide but tin still appreciate a quality moving-picture show.
-
Mar 23, 2019
This is 1 of those films that reveals a sense of reality that we may have not been aware of till information technology was cinematically unveiled to united states, and the very subject thing that fabricated a portfolio worth telling stirred up a morally complicated stance through a strongly-performed, silently-heavy argument. (B+) (Full review TBD)
This is 1 of those films that reveals a sense of reality that we may have non been aware of till information technology was cinematically unveiled to us, and the very subject affair that fabricated a portfolio worth telling stirred up a morally complicated stance through a strongly-performed, silently-heavy argument. (B+) (Full review TBD)
-
Jan 07, 2019
I went for Al Pacino, Goodman, Sarandon and I've stayed considering I wanted to know well-nigh the story. I had heard of it, just I did not know much about it. Not that there is much to know to be honest, but the film tries not to be too bias and lets y'all have your ain opinion and, most importantly, brings dorsum low-cal to a problem not still resolved.
I went for Al Pacino, Goodman, Sarandon and I've stayed because I wanted to know well-nigh the story. I had heard of information technology, but I did not know much most it. Not that at that place is much to know to be honest, just the film tries not to be too bias and lets y'all have your own opinion and, virtually importantly, brings back light to a problem not yet resolved.
-
October 22, 2017
A controversial really needs the viewer knowing which side he is on.
A controversial actually needs the viewer knowing which side he is on.
-
Oct 28, 2016
95% Watched this on 28/x/16 This film vividly tells y'all what exactly is incorrect about this society of yours, a reluctance to accept modify and a tendency to stand up by whatsoever is considered to be conventionally wrong. At that place is no justice in this world or else matters of such sensitive human rights would never accept been violated. Barry Levinson directs this film effectively though in a rather monotonous way. The picture is hard to watch, especially in the last 10 to 15 minutes. Al Pacino delivers a masterful performance, one that reminds the states of the talent for which he is world renowned.
95% Watched this on 28/10/16 This moving-picture show vividly tells you what exactly is wrong most this club of yours, a reluctance to take modify and a trend to stand by whatsoever is considered to be conventionally wrong. There is no justice in this world or else matters of such sensitive human rights would never have been violated. Barry Levinson directs this film finer though in a rather monotonous way. The film is difficult to lookout man, particularly in the concluding ten to xv minutes. Al Pacino delivers a masterful performance, ane that reminds the states of the talent for which he is earth renowned.
Source: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/you-dont-know-jack/reviews?type=user&sort=
0 Response to "Amazon Prime You Dont Know Jack"
Postar um comentário